Limb Lengthening ClinicsLimb LengtheningClinics
Blog/Safety

PRECICE nail complications: every risk class with its published rate

Limb Lengthening Clinics Editorial TeamReviewed by Op. Dr. Hüseyin Kavak (MD, Orthopedics & Traumatology) Clinical accuracy checkedLast reviewed Sep 11, 2026 Fact-checked against primary sources13 min read

In the largest published series (314 PRECICE and FITBONE nails, 2023), 53% of patients had at least one complication, but only 9–11% had permanent sequelae. Device failure (12–32% of segments), joint contracture (16%) and slow bone healing lead the list; deep infection runs 0.5–3%. Stryde nails added corrosion-linked osteolysis in 35% of segments before the 2021 recall.

PRECICE nail complications are common, mostly minor, and unusually well counted. The 2023 Aalborg and Nationwide Children's cohort of 314 FITBONE and PRECICE nails logged 269 complications in 257 patients: 53% had at least one, 35% needed a change of plan or an unplanned operation, and 9–11% were left with something permanent. The 2021 systematic review of 983 nail segments (747 of them PRECICE) put it at one complication for every three segments. Device trouble tops both lists; deep infection, nerve injury and blood clots each run between 0.5% and 3%. Below, every complication class with its published rate and the sample size behind it.

How often do PRECICE nail complications happen?

It depends on what gets counted. Frost and colleagues (Acta Orthopaedica, 2023) reviewed 314 lengthening nails in 257 patients at Aalborg University Hospital and Nationwide Children's Hospital, 80 of them PRECICE, and logged every event down to a knee contracture that physiotherapy fixed. Result: 53% of patients had at least one complication. By severity, 26% had a type I event (minimal intervention), 35% a type II (substantial change of plan, often an unplanned operation), 4% a type IIIA (goal not reached) and 11% a type IIIB (new pathology or permanent sequelae).

The same group's 2021 systematic review pooled 41 papers and 983 segments, 747 of them PRECICE: 332 complications, or 34% of segments, split 11% type I, 15% type II, 5% type IIIA and 3% type IIIB. PRECICE-only studies averaged 31% per segment against 46% for FITBONE-only studies, a gap the 2023 cohort could not confirm after adjusting for age and bone (relative risk 0.9, not significant).

Single-center PRECICE series land on both sides. Frommer's 90 antegrade femoral nails in Münster (median age 15, leg-length discrepancy) reported complications in 76% of patients and unplanned surgery in 20%. Paley's 51 cosmetic stature patients, as tabulated in the 2020 Bone & Joint Research review, had 0.16 problems, 0.23 obstacles and 0.02 complications per patient. Same device, different definitions, different patients.

SeriesSampleAny complicationSerious tier
Frost 2023, two centers (FITBONE + PRECICE)314 nails, 257 patients53% of patients11% type IIIB (permanent sequelae)
Frost 2021 systematic review (41 studies)983 segments, 747 PRECICE34% of segments3% type IIIB, 5% failed to reach goal
Frommer 2022, Münster (PRECICE, femur)90 patients76% of patients20% unplanned surgery
Paley 2015, cosmetic PRECICE (via Marwan 2020)51 patients0.16 problems + 0.23 obstacles per patient0.02 complications per patient
Novikov 2014, cosmetic Ilizarov (frame comparator)131 patients37% of patients18% needed reoperation

How often does the nail itself fail, bend or break?

X-ray of a motorized intramedullary lengthening nail inside a femur shortly after surgery, with the osteotomy gap visible.
A motorized lengthening nail (a FITBONE, the PRECICE's main competitor) in a femur shortly after surgery. The 314-nail and 983-segment complication series pooled both devices. Photo: Juliusjo, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Source: Wikimedia Commons

The implant is the most frequent source of PRECICE nail complications, and PRECICE nail failure is usually a mechanism or fixation problem rather than a broken implant. In the 314-nail cohort, device-related events occurred in 32% of segments (100 events): 22 distraction-mechanism failures, 29 attachment failures, 7 mechanical-strength failures and 42 others such as external-controller positioning problems. Not one of the 100 produced a type IIIA or IIIB outcome; the nails were revised or exchanged and the lengthening finished. In the 983-segment review the device accounted for 12% of segments, the distraction mechanism for 5%, and 1% of segments failed to reach the planned length for a device reason.

The manufacturer's instructions for use list the failure modes: loss of distraction, uncontrolled lengthening, failure to lengthen, implant bending, fracture, loosening and loss of fixation.

Bent and broken nails cluster in the cosmetic medical-tourism traffic. A 2025 Journal of Orthopaedics series from a US limb-lengthening center described 9 patients (22 lengthened bones) referred with complications after cosmetic lengthening, most of it performed abroad. Five bones (23%) had hardware failure, 3 bent and 2 broken, all femurs, and 4 of the 5 were fixed by exchange nailing. That is a referral sample, not an incidence rate. But a bent titanium nail was loaded past its yield point, which is what the weight-bearing rules below exist to prevent.

Joint contracture and lost range of motion

Joints are the second-largest source of PRECICE nail problems. Joint complications affected 23% of segments in the 314-nail cohort, contracture alone 16% (51 events, 10 graded type IIIB). Frommer's 90 femoral nails recorded temporary loss of knee motion in 20% of patients and hip motion in 2%, all resolved with physiotherapy; one patient (1%) had a knee subluxation. The PRECICE IFU itself cites a retrospective study with adjacent-joint motion loss in 4% of patients and subluxation in 6%.

The pattern follows the bone. Femoral lengthening pulls on the quadriceps and iliotibial band and stiffens the knee; tibial lengthening shortens the calf and drives the ankle into equinus. Frames make it worse because the wires transfix muscle: Novikov's 131 cosmetic Ilizarov patients had fixed knee flexion in 11% and ankle equinus in 9%. The nail removes the tethering, not the stretch.

The treatment is dull and non-negotiable: daily physiotherapy through distraction, knee-extension splinting for femurs, dorsiflexion work for tibias, and a surgeon willing to change the distraction rate when motion drops, which Frommer's team did in 27% of patients. A contracture caught early is a physiotherapy problem; caught late it is a surgical release. The cosmetic PRECICE series had exactly one complication in 51 patients: an iliotibial band contracture.

Bone: premature consolidation, slow healing, fracture

Bone complications are less frequent than device or joint events and more often serious. The 314-nail cohort logged 37 bone events (12% of segments): 16 delayed healings, 14 fractures, 3 premature consolidations and 3 secondary malalignments. The 983-segment review found bone problems in 8% of segments: delayed healing in 46 (about 5%), premature consolidation in 19 (2%) and fracture in 8.

Premature consolidation is the failure specific to a slow nail. The new bone bridges before the target length is reached, the magnetic drive cannot pull bridged bone apart, and the fix is a re-osteotomy. Frommer's series needed unplanned surgery for premature consolidation or insufficient distraction in 8% of patients (7 of 90) and recorded prolonged consolidation in 6%. Consolidation ran at a median 31 days per centimeter, so a 7 cm femur is healed roughly seven months after surgery on the median.

Two numbers drive the bone risk. Every extra millimeter raised complication risk by 1% in the Aalborg regression (RR 1.01 per mm), and a short-stature indication raised it by 50–80% against congenital cases. Cosmetic patients ask for the largest gains on the healthiest bones, and the data say the gain is what costs them. The US referral series is the extreme case: 9 of 22 bones (45%) arrived with a nonunion or malunion.

How common are infection, nerve injury and blood clots?

These are the events patients fear most, and they are the least frequent. Infection: 17 events in 314 nails (5%): 6 superficial, 4 deep soft-tissue, 3 osteomyelitis and 4 unclassified; in the 983-segment review, 8 infections (0.8%), 4 of them osteomyelitis; Frommer reported osteomyelitis in 3% (3 of 90). The frame comparison is narrower than clinic marketing suggests. Novikov's 131 Ilizarov patients had a deep-infection rate of 2.3% (3 patients), close to the nail cohorts' 0.5–3%. What disappears with a fully internal nail is the pin site: pin-tract infection was the most common problem across the frame and LON series in the 2020 review of 795 cosmetic patients.

Nerve injury: 7 neurological events in 314 nails (2%), including 2 cases of paralysis; 8 in 983 segments (0.8%), 5 of them paresthesia. Paley's 51 cosmetic PRECICE patients had 2 common peroneal neuropathies; Novikov's frame series had 6 (4.6%), one permanent. The tibia is the dangerous segment: tibial nails carried a 70% higher complication risk than femoral nails (RR 1.7) in the Aalborg data.

Blood clots: 3 vascular events in 314 nails (1%), one a deep vein thrombosis; 10 in 983 segments (1%), 4 of them DVTs; 1 DVT in the 51 cosmetic PRECICE patients. Both Frost papers grade DVT as type IIIB. Months on crutches after bilateral leg surgery is the kind of immobility clots follow; ask for the thromboprophylaxis protocol in writing.

Stryde: corrosion, osteolysis and a Class II recall

Stryde was the stainless-steel PRECICE built for full weight-bearing, and it failed at the telescoping junction. The Münster group (Frommer et al., Bone & Joint Research, 2021) followed 57 consecutive Stryde lengthenings. Osteolysis beside the junction appeared on X-ray in 20 of 57 segments (35%) at a mean of 9.5 months, and 8 of those 20 patients had rest and walking pain. Of the first 24 retrieved nails, 20 (83%) showed macroscopic corrosion, with chromium the main metallic element in the debris. These Stryde-era PRECICE complications were a materials failure, not a mechanism failure.

The FDA record is recall Z-1323-2021: Class II, initiated by NuVasive on 12 February 2021 and posted 30 March 2021, covering all lots. It lists 2,360 units distributed worldwide, including Turkey, Germany, Greece, Spain, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and gives the reason as "pain and bony abnormalities at the interface between the telescoping nail segments". Status in September 2026: open. Class II is the FDA's middle tier, not its most serious.

PRECICE 2 is titanium, a different alloy. The FDA's June 2023 letter says it is not aware of biocompatibility adverse events with titanium PRECICE devices while it continues to monitor; the IFU still lists metallosis, osteolysis and wear-debris reactions as possible events. PRECICE Max has its own open Class II recall (Z-0500-2025, initiated 30 September 2024, 164 devices in Florida and Nevada) for design, manufacturing and validation-documentation issues. A PubMed search for "PRECICE Max" in September 2026 returned one paper, about broken Stryde nails.

What drives the risk up: weight-bearing, age, segment

The label is blunt. The PRECICE IFU (LC0305 Rev D, March 2023) says the nail "cannot withstand the stresses of full weight bearing" in the femur or tibia, and bars activities that load more than 20% of body weight onto the treated limb during distraction. It caps patient weight at 57 kg for the 8.5–10.5 mm nails and, for most 10.7–12.5 mm configurations, 114 kg. Crutches or a walker are part of the device, not an optional extra.

The Aalborg regression gives the patient-side multipliers. Tibia versus femur: RR 1.7. Age 30–39 versus 10–19: RR 2.1; age 50–59: RR 2.6. Short-stature indication versus congenital: RR 1.5–1.8 depending on the model. Each millimeter lengthened: plus 1%. A 35-year-old man lengthening both tibias by 7 cm for height sits in every one of those higher-risk boxes at once. He cannot change his age; he can change the segment, the amount and the discipline.

Two more items belong on the checklist. The FDA's 2023 letter allows no more than two PRECICE devices in a patient at once, which puts simultaneous four-segment lengthening outside the label. And the nail is MR Unsafe for as long as it is in, which matters if you are injured or fall ill in the interim.

Removal surgery: the second operation's own risks

A PRECICE nail is temporary. The IFU says the device "should be removed after implantation time of no more than one year", and the FDA repeated that reminder to surgeons in June 2023. That means a second operation, a second anesthetic and a second bill, with its own risks.

Frost's team audited 271 elective nail removals (FITBONE, PRECICE and Stryde) in 225 patients. Complications occurred during 3% of removals, mostly hardware left behind or a nail that resisted extraction, and after 13% of them. The post-operative events were 18 cases of new knee pain (8% of retrograde femoral and 7% of tibial removals, all nails that came out through the knee joint) and 4 fractures, 2 needing surgery. By bone, 11% of femoral and 26% of tibial removals had a complication.

In practice removal happens close to the label: Frommer's group scheduled it one year after consolidation and had retrieved 92% of nails at a median of 17 months. Get the removal written into the quote, with the surgeon named and the location fixed, before the first operation. A clinic that quotes the implantation alone is quoting half the treatment.

PRECICE vs LON vs Ilizarov: how the risk profile shifts

The 2020 Bone & Joint Research review of 795 cosmetic stature patients gives the cleanest side-by-side, with two caveats: the implantable-nail figures come from a single series (Paley's 51 cosmetic PRECICE patients) and none of the differences reached statistical significance. Per patient, classic Ilizarov frames ran 0.7 problems, 1.5 obstacles and 0.2 complications; LON 1.1, 0.7 and 0.1; the implantable nail 0.16, 0.23 and 0.02. Mean gain was 5.6 cm with the nail against 6.4–7.6 cm with frames and LON, so the nail's better numbers partly reflect asking for less.

What the frame adds is pin-related: pin-tract infection as the leading problem, peroneal neuropathy in 4.6% and knee flexion deformity in 11% of Novikov's 131 patients, plus months of external hardware. What LON adds is a pin-to-nail contamination path and two operations. Magnetic nail complications are the device-failure column, a strict no-weight-bearing phase and a mandatory removal.

PRECICE nail complications, then, are mostly device and joint events that get fixed, with a 3–11% floor of permanent harm that no implant removes, a documented corrosion failure in the Stryde generation, and a removal operation built into the plan. The decisive variables in the data are the segment, the amount, the patient's age and the weight-bearing discipline; of those, only age is out of the patient's hands. Choose a surgeon who grades complications by a published system and will show you the log.

EventPRECICE / FITBONE nail (Frost 2023, 314 nails)Ilizarov, cosmetic (Novikov 2014, 131 patients)
Any complication53% of patients37% of patients
Pin-site infectionNone (no pins)Leading problem in frame series; 3.8% needed intervention
Deep infection or osteomyelitis2.2% of segments (7 of 314)2.3% (3 of 131)
Nerve injury2% of segments (7 of 314), 2 with paralysisPeroneal neuropathy 4.6% (6 of 131), 1 permanent
Joint contracture16% of segmentsKnee flexion deformity 11%, ankle equinus 9%
Device or frame failure32% of segments, none permanentWire or pin breakage 5 of 131 (Marwan 2020 tabulation)
Second operationNail removal within about a year (IFU)Frame removal after a mean 31 days per cm in the fixator
Key takeaways
  • ·53% of patients had at least one complication in the largest series (314 nails); 9–11% had permanent sequelae.
  • ·Device failure hit 32% of segments in that cohort and 12% in the 983-segment review; none of the 100 device events left permanent harm.
  • ·Joint contracture: 16% of segments; temporary knee stiffness in 20% of Frommer's 90 femoral nails, all resolved with physiotherapy.
  • ·Deep infection 0.5–3%, nerve injury 0.8–2%, vascular events about 1% (DVT 0.3–2%). Pin-site infection, the frame's leading problem, does not exist with a fully internal nail.
  • ·Stryde: osteolysis in 35% of 57 segments, corrosion in 83% of retrieved nails, FDA Class II recall Z-1323-2021 (2,360 units, still open).
  • ·Risk multipliers: tibia RR 1.7, age 30–39 RR 2.1, short stature RR 1.5–1.8, plus 1% per millimeter. Removal surgery adds a 13% post-operative complication rate.

Quick answers

How risky is limb lengthening?+

PRECICE nail complications affected 53% of patients in the largest series (314 FITBONE and PRECICE nails, 2023), and 9–11% were left with permanent sequelae. Deep infection runs 0.5–3%, nerve injury 0.8–2% and DVT 0.3–2%. Tibial lengthening, age over 30, a cosmetic indication and every extra millimeter all raise the risk.

How long does it take to recover from Precice nail surgery?+

Distraction runs about 1 mm a day, so a 7 cm gain takes roughly 10 weeks with no more than 20% of body weight on the leg, per the IFU. Consolidation ran at a median 31 days per centimeter in the 90-patient Münster series, so a 7 cm femur is healed around seven months after surgery. The nail comes out within about a year.

What happens if a PRECICE nail stops lengthening?+

Distraction-mechanism failure affected 5% of segments in the 983-segment review and 22 of 314 nails in the 2023 cohort. The first checks are the external controller's position over the magnet and an X-ray. If the mechanism has failed, the surgeon can exchange the nail or stop at the length achieved. None of the 100 device events in the 2023 cohort caused permanent harm.

Does the Stryde recall affect the PRECICE 2 nail?+

No. Stryde is stainless steel and corroded at its telescoping junction, with osteolysis in 35% of 57 segments in the Münster series; FDA recall Z-1323-2021 covers the Stryde, and the FDA's 2023 letter says the stainless-steel Bone Transport and Plate devices remain recalled too. PRECICE 2 is titanium, and the FDA said in June 2023 it was not aware of biocompatibility adverse events with titanium PRECICE devices. PRECICE Max had a separate Class II recall in September 2024.

Can a PRECICE nail break?+

Yes, rarely. Mechanical-strength failures accounted for 7 of 314 nails in the 2023 cohort and 44 of 983 segments in the systematic review. In a US series of 22 cosmetic bones referred with complications, 3 nails had bent and 2 had broken, all femurs, and exchange nailing fixed 4 of the 5. The IFU bars loads above 20% of body weight during distraction.

Does a PRECICE nail have to be removed?+

Yes. The IFU says the device should be removed after no more than one year, and the FDA repeated that in June 2023. Removal is a second operation with its own risks: in 271 elective removals, 3% had a complication during surgery and 13% afterwards, mostly knee pain, plus 4 fractures. Have the removal, its surgeon and its price written into the quote before the first operation.

Sources

  1. 1.Frost MW, Rahbek O, Iobst C, Bafor A, Duncan M, Kold S. Complications and risk factors of intramedullary bone lengthening nails: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 314 FITBONE and PRECICE nails. Acta Orthopaedica, 2023 (PMC9940487)314 nails in 257 patients (80 PRECICE), 2005–2021; 53% of patients had a complication; severity grades I 26%, II 35%, IIIA 4%, IIIB 11% per patient; device 100 events (32% of segments, none IIIA/IIIB), joint 72 (contracture 51), bone 37, infection 17, neurological 7, vascular 3 (1 DVT); RR tibia 1.7, age 30–39 2.1, 50–59 2.6, short stature 1.5–1.8, +1% per mm; PRECICE vs FITBONE adjusted RR 0.9
  2. 2.Frost MW, Rahbek O, Traerup J, Ceccotti AA, Kold S. Systematic review of complications with externally controlled motorized intramedullary bone lengthening nails (FITBONE and PRECICE) in 983 segments. Acta Orthopaedica, 2021 (PMC7919879)41 studies, 983 segments in 782 patients (747 PRECICE); 332 complications = 34% of segments; type I 11%, II 15%, IIIA 5%, IIIB 3%; device 12% (distraction mechanism 5%, mechanical strength 44, attachment 33), bone 8% (delayed healing 46, premature consolidation 19, fracture 8), joint 6% (contracture 53), infection 0.8% (8, osteomyelitis 4), neurology 0.8%, vascular 1% (4 DVT); PRECICE-only studies 31% vs FITBONE-only 46%
  3. 3.Frommer A, Roedl R, Gosheger G, et al. What are the potential benefits and risks of using magnetically driven antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails for femoral lengthening to treat leg length discrepancy? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2022 (PMC8923575)90 patients, PRECICE P2 antegrade femur, median age 15, median follow-up 35 months; 76% any complication, 20% unplanned surgery; distraction-rate adjustment 27% (faster 16%, slower 11%); temporary knee ROM loss 20% and hip 2%, all resolved; osteomyelitis 3%, knee subluxation 1%; premature consolidation/insufficient distraction needing surgery 8%, prolonged consolidation 6%; consolidation index 31 days/cm; 92% of nails retrieved at median 17 months
  4. 4.Marwan Y, Cohen D, Alotaibi M, Addar A, Bernstein M, Hamdy R. Cosmetic stature lengthening: systematic review of outcomes and complications. Bone & Joint Research, 2020 (PMC7342054)11 studies, 795 cosmetic patients; per-patient problems/obstacles/complications: Ilizarov 0.7/1.5/0.2, LON 1.1/0.7/0.1, implantable nail 0.16/0.23/0.02 (ILN group 63 patients; differences not significant); mean gain nail 5.6 cm vs frames/LON 6.4–7.6 cm; pin-track infection the most common problem; tabulates Paley 2015 (51 cosmetic PRECICE patients: 1 complication, 2 peroneal neuropathies, 1 DVT, nail breakage, premature consolidation 1)
  5. 5.Novikov KI, Subramanyam KN, Muradisinov SO, Novikova OS, Kolesnikova ES. Cosmetic lower limb lengthening by Ilizarov apparatus: what are the risks? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2014 (PMC4182395)131 cosmetic Ilizarov patients, mean gain 6.9 cm, external fixator index 31 days/cm; 48 patients (37%) had 59 complications; pin-tract infection needing intervention 5 (3.8%), deep infection 3 (2.3%), peroneal neuropathy 6 (4.6%, 1 permanent), equinus 12 (9.2%), knee flexion deformity 14 (11%); 23 patients (18%) reoperated
  6. 6.Al Ramlawi A, Over DJ, Assayag M, McClure P, et al. Complications after cosmetic limb lengthening, a specialized center experience. Journal of Orthopaedics, 2025 (PMC11882336)Referral series, not an incidence study: 9 patients, 22 bones after cosmetic intramedullary-nail lengthening (index surgery Turkey 3, Greece 2, Germany 1, US 1, unknown 2); hardware failure 5/22 (23%: 3 bent, 2 broken, all femurs; 4 treated by exchange nailing); non/malunion 9/22 (45%); hip/knee contracture 2/18 limbs; peroneal nerve entrapment 1; post-revision DVT 1 (IVC filter)
  7. 7.Frommer A, Roedl R, Gosheger G, Hasselmann J, Fuest C, et al. Focal osteolysis and corrosion at the junction of Precice Stryde intramedullary lengthening device: preliminary clinical, radiological, and metallurgic analysis of 57 lengthened segments. Bone & Joint Research, 2021 (PMC8333033)57 consecutive Stryde lengthenings, Münster, 2019–2020; osteolysis at the telescoping junction in 20/57 segments (35%) at mean 9.5 months; 8/20 with rest and ambulation pain; 24 nails retrieved, macroscopic corrosion in 20 (83%); SEM/EDX pitting and crevice corrosion, chromium the main element
  8. 8.FDA Medical Device Recalls database: Class 2 Device Recall, The PRECICE System (PRECICE STRYDE), recall number Z-1323-2021Initiated by firm 12 February 2021, posted 30 March 2021; Class II; all lots; 2,360 units; worldwide distribution incl. Turkey, Germany, Greece, Spain, Saudi Arabia, UAE; reason: complaints of pain and bony abnormalities at the interface between the telescoping nail segments; status open (checked 11 September 2026)
  9. 9.FDA Medical Device Recalls database: Class 2 Device Recall, Precice Max, recall number Z-0500-2025Initiated by Globus Medical 30 September 2024, posted 21 November 2024; Class II; 164 devices; US distribution to Florida and Nevada; reason: potential design, manufacturing and validation-documentation issues; status open (checked 11 September 2026)
  10. 10.FDA: UPDATE — NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics' Precice Devices, Letter to Health Care Providers, 28 June 2023Reminds surgeons the device should be removed after one year; no patients under 50 lb or above the IFU weight limit; no more than two Precice devices at once; FDA not aware of biocompatibility adverse events with titanium Precice devices and continues to monitor; stainless-steel Stryde, Bone Transport and Plate remain recalled
  11. 11.NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics: PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System, Instructions for Use, LC0305 Rev D (March 2023)Warning that the nail cannot withstand full weight bearing in femur or tibia; no activities loading more than 20% of body weight during distraction; maximum patient weight 57 kg (8.5–10.5 mm nails) and 114 kg (10.7–12.5 mm); removal after no more than one year; MR Unsafe; not recommended with pacemakers; device-specific adverse-event list incl. loss of distraction, failure to lengthen, bending, fracture, metallosis and osteolysis; cited retrospective study: joint ROM loss 4%, subluxation 6%
  12. 12.Frost MW, Kold S, Rahbek O, Bafor A, Duncan M, Iobst CA. Complications in elective removal of 271 bone lengthening nails (FITBONE, PRECICE and STRYDE). Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 2021 (PMC8578244)271 elective removals in 225 patients; complications during 3% of removals (hardware left behind, extraction problems) and after 13%; 18 cases of post-operative knee pain (8% of retrograde femoral, 7% of tibial removals); 4 fractures, 2 needing surgery; 11% of femoral and 26% of tibial removals had a complication
Was this useful?

Get matched with a verified clinic.

Our editor reviews your inquiry and introduces you to 2–3 clinics that fit your budget and goals. First clinic consult is usually free. We never sell your data.

Get matched — free →
Are you a clinic?

Get listed in our directory.

We verify every clinic before listing — surgeons, methods, hospital affiliation, regulatory status. Submit your clinic for editorial review. No paid rankings. No hidden fees.

Apply to be listed