PRECICE Stryde
PRECICE Stryde Weight-Bearing Nail
A heavier-duty PRECICE variant allowing full weight-bearing during distraction — recalled in 2021.
PRECICE Stryde was a stainless-steel version of the PRECICE magnet nail, built to carry more weight during lengthening than the titanium PRECICE 2. NuVasive withdrew it in February 2021 after reports of pain and bone changes at the nail's telescoping junction, and the recall remains open. Nobody should receive one today. Existing patients need scheduled imaging and a removal plan.
How it works
The Stryde nail was designed to allow full weight-bearing during the distraction phase, shortening total recovery time. NuVasive initiated a voluntary field-safety action on February 20, 2021, and the FDA classified it as a Class II recall on 12 February 2021, after reports of corrosion at the telescoping junction and associated bone changes (osteolysis) documented in peer-reviewed series. The device was withdrawn from the US market. Some clinics outside the US continued to offer Stryde afterward; patients considering Stryde today should discuss the recall history and long-term monitoring with their surgeon.
Schematic. Bone geometry and hardware placement are illustrative; consult your surgeon for procedure specifics.
What Stryde was, and how it differed from PRECICE 2
Mechanically, Stryde was a PRECICE nail: a telescoping rod locked into the femur or tibia, extended from outside by the External Remote Controller held over an internal magnet, in daily sessions that added up to a prescribed amount. The difference was the metal. PRECICE 2 is titanium; Stryde was Biodur 108 stainless steel, and the steel nail was rated to carry far more load. The titanium nail was limited to 50 to 75 lb of post-operative weight-bearing; Stryde was rated for 150 to 250 lb, which is what made it attractive for adult stature lengthening. More than 2,000 were implanted worldwide between 2018 and 2021.
Patients did the same things a PRECICE 2 patient does: ERC sessions at home, a distraction log, X-rays. In a published single-centre comparison of 30 Stryde and 36 PRECICE femurs (Galal et al., 2022), the Stryde group distracted more slowly (0.6 mm a day against 0.9) and healed more slowly per centimetre. The selling point was walking with weight on the leg during lengthening, not speed.
Who it was for, and who should not have it now
The label was the PRECICE label: adults, limb lengthening, fracture fixation, non-unions, bone transport. The extra weight allowance made it attractive for heavier and taller adults, and for bilateral cosmetic cases where months on crutches were the main objection to PRECICE 2. The label did not change; the weight allowance did.
Today the answer to "who is it for" is nobody new. The FDA told surgeons in July 2021 to stop implanting any stainless-steel PRECICE device and recorded that NuVasive had voluntarily removed them all from the US market as of February 2021. The UK regulator, the MHRA, reinstated the titanium PRECICE nails for adults in March 2023 but did not reinstate the CE marks for Stryde, Bone Transport or Plate, which remain suspended from the UK market. The FDA recall record lists distribution to the United States and 27 other countries and territories, including Turkey, Germany, Spain and Italy, so a clinic anywhere that calls Stryde fine to implant is describing withdrawn stock.
The recall: what happened, and when
The FDA recall record (Z-1323-2021) gives the sequence. On 12 February 2021 NuVasive emailed surgeons an "Urgent Field Safety Notice" about "several reports of adverse events potentially related to biological safety", specifically "pain and bony abnormalities at the interface between the telescoping nail segments", told them not to implant the affected devices, and arranged returns. The FDA posted the action on 30 March 2021 as a Class 2 recall covering all lots, 2,360 units, and the record is still listed as open. The same event covered PRECICE Plate and PRECICE Bone Transport, the other two stainless-steel devices.
In July 2021 the FDA wrote to health care providers that it had "received reports of pain and changes in the surrounding bone and soft tissue" in Stryde patients, and that the events "may be related to corrosion, wear, and previously unanticipated exposure of components". NuVasive also put a global ship hold on every PRECICE device in February 2021 while it re-tested biocompatibility. The titanium nails were later reinstated in the UK; Stryde was not.
What the corrosion did to bone: the evidence
Two European groups published the picture within months. A Danish nationwide study (Rölfing et al., Acta Orthopaedica 2021) reviewed all 30 Stryde segments in 27 patients: 21 of 30 showed radiographic changes at the junction, 19 with osteolysis (bone loss), 12 with periosteal reaction and 12 with cortical thickening. Late-onset pain was prominent in 8 patients and, the authors wrote, "likely to be a prodrome to the bony changes". A Münster series (Frommer et al., Bone & Joint Research 2021) of 57 lengthened segments found osteolysis next to the junction in 20 (35%) at a mean of 9.5 months after surgery; 8 of those 20 patients reported pain at rest and on walking during consolidation. Of 24 retrieved nails, 20 (83%) showed visible corrosion at the junction.
Two things matter for anyone still carrying a Stryde. The changes appeared late, during consolidation, so a good early course proves nothing. And pain usually came first. The Danish group's advice: monitor every Stryde at regular intervals until it is removed, and X-ray immediately if pain starts late. Both groups: remove the nail as early as possible once the regenerate has consolidated.
What it costs now: monitoring and removal, not implants
There is no purchase price to compare because the device is not sold. The cost that remains is carried by patients who already have one: follow-up radiographs at regular intervals, further imaging if pain appears, the removal operation, and in the worst case conversion to a standard trauma nail, an option the Münster authors describe for symptomatic patients whose bone has not consolidated. Whether your original clinic covers any of that depends on the contract you signed, so read it. Patients who travelled abroad for Stryde in 2019 or 2020 may now be paying for follow-up at home, in a system that did not implant the device.
If you are shopping today and a quote mentions Stryde, treat the price as irrelevant. The question is why a withdrawn implant is on the menu at all.
How to read a clinic, if you have a Stryde or are offered one
If you already have a Stryde: ask your surgeon, in writing, what the monitoring interval is, what they look for on the film (osteolysis, periosteal reaction, cortical thickening around the junction), and when they plan removal. The FDA's July 2021 guidance did not recommend removing non-painful, well-functioning nails from asymptomatic patients before one year, and said removal decisions should be made case by case; the Danish and German authors argue for removal as early as possible after consolidation. Both agree on one thing: new pain late in treatment means an X-ray that week, not at the next routine visit. Keep your implant card and serial number.
If a clinic is offering you a Stryde now, that is the red flag, and it needs no second one. Variations to watch for: "the recall was only an American issue" (the FDA record lists distribution to 27 other countries, and the UK CE mark was not reinstated); "our stock is the improved version" (the manufacturer withdrew the product line); and "it can stay in permanently". Walk away and take your imaging with you.
At a glance
- Typical gain
- 5–8 cm
- Total recovery
- 10–18 weeks
- Distraction sites
- femur, tibia
- External hardware
- No
- Manufacturer
- NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics — discontinued; FDA Class II recall 12 February 2021
- Status
- Historical / recalled
What this means for a patient
- ●Full weight-bearing during distraction (historically)
- ●Faster functional recovery vs. PRECICE 2 (historically)
Trade-offs and risks
- ●FDA Class II recall (2021) due to corrosion concerns
- ●Not available in the US
- ●Long-term safety data limited
5 verified clinics offering PRECICE Stryde

3D-Surgery
Dr. Peter H. Thaller, Dr. med. (LMU Munich), MSc in Advanced Orthopaedics and Traumatology; Gavril Award in Limb Lengthening 2020; author of 60+ peer-reviewed publications

DXB Orthopedics
Dr. Mohsin e Azam, MBBS (Hamdard University); FCPS Orthopaedics (CPSP); Fellowship in Musculoskeletal Oncology, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna; Fellowship in Limb Reconstruction & Ilizarov Surgery, Istanbul University; DHA-registered
Cairo International Centre for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction
Dr. Yasser Elbatrawy, MBBS Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine (1984–1991); Doctoral degree (University of Maryland, Baltimore — limb lengthening and reconstruction); ASAMI Fellowship under Prof Maurizio Catagni (3 years); Advanced Diploma, Ilizarov Institute, Kurgan, Siberia (2000); Paediatric LLR Fellowship, University of Maryland (with Drs Dror Paley, John Herzenberg, Kevin Tetsworth); Professor, Damietta Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University (since March 2000)

Centre for Advanced Orthopaedics
Dr. Sarbjit Singh, MBBS (Singapore); FRCS (Edinburgh); FRCS (Glasgow); FAMS (Orthopaedics); Fellowship in Paediatric Orthopaedics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto (1991); Founding President, ASAMI ASEAN; Adjunct Professor, SIM University (2007–2009)
Trigon Orthopedia
Dr. n. med. Daniel Kozyra, 1st specialisation, Orthopaedics & Traumatology (1989); 2nd specialisation, Medical Rehabilitation (1998); Member, Polish Orthopaedic-Traumatological Society, Polish Rehabilitation Society, Military Medical Chamber
Browse every leg lengthening surgeon in the directory or, if you are new to all of this, start with what height surgery actually involves. For the complication record of this method family, read PRECICE nail complications — rates by class.
Frequently asked questions
I have a Stryde nail. Do I need it removed right now?
Not necessarily this week, but you need a plan. The FDA's July 2021 letter did not recommend removing non-painful, well-functioning nails from asymptomatic patients before one year, and said the decision belongs to you and your surgeon case by case. The Danish and German groups who documented the osteolysis recommend removal as early as possible once the new bone has consolidated. Nobody recommends leaving it in indefinitely: the corrosion sits at a junction that cannot be inspected without imaging.
What symptoms should make me call my surgeon?
Pain that starts late, during consolidation, after lengthening has finished. In the Danish nationwide study, late-onset pain was prominent in 8 of 27 patients and the authors called it a likely prodrome to the bony changes; in the Münster series, 8 of the 20 patients with osteolysis reported pain at rest and on walking. Swelling or warmth over the nail, or a new limp, belong on the same list. The recommended response is a radiograph at once, not at the next scheduled visit.
Was Stryde recalled everywhere, or only in the United States?
The withdrawal was global. The FDA recall record lists distribution to the United States and 27 other countries and territories, including Turkey, Germany, Spain, Italy and Canada, and records that NuVasive's field safety notice told customers to stop implanting and return stock. In the UK the MHRA lifted its suspension of the titanium PRECICE nails in March 2023 but explicitly did not reinstate the CE marks for Stryde, which remains suspended there.
Why did Stryde corrode when PRECICE 2 did not?
The nails share a design but not a metal. PRECICE 2 is titanium; Stryde was Biodur 108 stainless steel. Retrieval analyses found corrosion concentrated at the telescoping junction where the two halves slide, with chromium as the main corrosion product. The FDA said in July 2021 that the events may relate to corrosion, wear and unanticipated exposure of internal components, that the root cause, steel alone or a shared design feature, was uncertain, and that it knew of no biocompatibility events in the titanium nails.
Did the bone changes stop the new bone from healing?
Mostly no. In the Danish series the changes appeared at late stages, around consolidation of the regenerate, after the lengthening itself had gone well. The Münster group describes osteolysis appearing at a mean of 9.5 months after surgery, adjacent to the junction rather than in the regenerate. The concern is what the bone loss and corrosion products do over time, which is unknown, not whether the leg lengthened.
Can I still get a Stryde nail abroad in 2026?
You should not be able to, and if you can, do not. The manufacturer withdrew the product line in 2021, the FDA recall covers all lots and is still listed as open, and the UK CE mark has not been reinstated. Any clinic offering one is offering old inventory that the manufacturer asked to have returned in 2021. The current titanium alternatives from the same family are PRECICE 2 and PRECICE Max, each with its own page on this site.
Reading on PRECICE Stryde
- Medical tourism for orthopedic surgery: how to vet a clinic abroad before you pay a deposit
Medical tourism orthopedic surgery checklist: verify JCI status, the surgeon's case volume, implant recalls, follow-up at home, and what a quote must include.
- PRECICE nail complications: every risk class with its published rate
PRECICE nail complications: device failure 12–32% of segments, contracture 16%, deep infection 0.5–3%, the Stryde recall, removal surgery. See each rate with n.
- The PRECICE nail, explained: magnet, sizes, removal and cost by country
PRECICE nail explained: magnet-driven titanium lengthening rod. See sizes, weight limits, the one-year removal rule, the Stryde recall and prices by country.
- Is limb lengthening surgery safe in 2026?
Limb lengthening runs a 30-45% any-complication and 5-15% serious rate across published cosmetic series. Safety is more surgeon-dependent than method choice.
- Can things go wrong years after limb lengthening surgery?
Late limb lengthening complications: refracture, nerve pain, joint stiffness. Most correlate with early-recovery shortcuts, not the surgery itself.
- The PRECICE Stryde recall, explained — and what it means in 2026
FDA Class II recall of the PRECICE Stryde nail (February 2021). Timeline, why it happened, monitoring protocol, and 5 questions to ask any clinic.
- FDA Medical Device Recalls database: PRECICE STRYDE, recall number Z-1323-2021 (firm-initiated February 12, 2021; posted March 30, 2021; Class 2; status open)
- FDA: Potential Biocompatibility Concerns with NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics' Precice Devices, Letter to Health Care Providers (July 8, 2021; archived copy, original page since removed from fda.gov)
- MHRA Device Safety Information DSI 2023/006: NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics PRECICE Titanium Systems, UK suspension lifted; Biodur systems (Bone Transport, Stryde, Plate) remain suspended (March 2023)
- Rölfing JD, Kold S, Nygaard T, et al. Pain, osteolysis, and periosteal reaction are associated with the STRYDE limb lengthening nail: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Acta Orthop 2021;92(4):479-484 (PMC8428270)
- Frommer A, Roedl R, Gosheger G, et al. Focal osteolysis and corrosion at the junction of Precice Stryde intramedullary lengthening device: preliminary clinical, radiological, and metallurgic analysis of 57 lengthened segments. Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):425-436 (PMC8333033)
- Galal S, Shin J, Principe P, et al. STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022;142:3555-3561 (PMC9596511)
This page is editorial reporting, not medical advice. Every patient anatomy is different — technique selection requires in-person consultation with a qualified surgeon.