Limb Lengthening ClinicsLimb LengtheningClinics
Method profile

Guichet Nail (G-Nail)

Guichet Nail (G-Nail) — Weight-Bearing Intramedullary Nail

A fully weight-bearing internal nail lengthened mechanically by controlled leg rotation — no external frame, walking with crutches from day one.

The Guichet nail is a fully implanted mechanical lengthening nail. You lengthen it yourself by rotating the leg back and forth about 20 degrees until it clicks; 15 clicks equal 1 mm, one day's target. Crutch-assisted weight-bearing starts on the day of surgery. Most peer-reviewed data comes from its predecessor, the Albizzia, and pain during clicking is the recurring problem.

Medically reviewed by Op. Dr. Hüseyin Kavak(MD, Orthopedics & Traumatology)Last reviewed Sep 11, 2026

How it works

The Guichet nail (G-Nail) is a fully implanted mechanical lengthening nail based on the Albizzia nail that Dr Jean-Marc Guichet introduced in 1991, with the current version dating to 2010. It has no motor and no magnet: an internal ratchet advances 1/15 mm for roughly every 20 degrees of controlled leg rotation the patient performs, so lengthening is driven by movement rather than an external device. Its defining advantage is full weight-bearing with crutches from the day of surgery. The trade-off is that the rotational maneuvers used to lengthen can be painful at the osteotomy site.

How the clicks work and what you do every day

The nail is two metal tubes, one sliding inside the other. Twisting the leg turns one tube against an internal ratchet, and each notch lets the nail out by one-fifteenth of a millimetre. That is the click you hear and feel. Dr Guichet's own site describes the routine plainly: 15 clicking movements produce 1 mm, performed as five clicks three times a day, muscles relaxed, hip and knee usually in slight flexion. His 2003 paper in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery used the same figure, fifteen alternating internal and external rotations per millimetre. The rotation needed per notch is about 20 degrees, according to the Freiburg institute that builds its own Albizzia-derived nail on the same principle.

There is no remote control, no magnet and no battery. You, a relative or a physiotherapist perform the movement. That independence is the selling point. It is also the weak point: the movement has to be repeated about 900 times for a 6 cm gain, and it hurts some people badly enough that they cannot finish it without help.

Who it suits and where it is offered

This is a European device with a European footprint. The inventor, Jean-Marc Guichet, currently lists consulting rooms and operating hospitals in London and Milan on his site; the site's patient stories also describe surgery and nail removal in Marseille. Beyond his own practice, a clinic in Athens listed on this site offers the nail under the name X-os G-nail and describes it as CE-marked in the EU since 2010. The published Albizzia series came from Nancy, Montpellier, Madrid and Salford. None of the 64 US clinics or 22 Turkish clinics on this site list it.

It suits a patient who wants an internal nail without weight-bearing restrictions and who is prepared to do the clicking personally, every day, for two months or more. The inventor's site is candid that the femur takes priority in bilateral cases and that the tibia heals less well, with some tibias needing a bone graft. A patient with low pain tolerance, or nobody at home to help with the rotations, should think hard before choosing a rotation-driven nail.

Protocol: rate, gain and removal

Clicking starts around day five and runs at 1 mm a day, the rate Guichet described in 1999 and the Madrid group used across its 24 femora. The Athens clinic states it takes the first centimetre in the operating theatre to shorten the lengthening phase. The inventor's site puts a 6 cm femoral gain at about two months of clicking and gives the femoral ceiling as 10 cm, more only with a nail exchange.

Published gains sit well below that ceiling. Guichet's 2003 series averaged 6.3 cm in bilateral stature cases (range 4.6 to 8.4 cm) and 3.4 cm in unilateral discrepancy cases. Acharya and Guichet's 27 bilateral cosmetic patients averaged 6.2 cm. Montpellier averaged 4.7 cm across mixed indications.

Walking: the inventor's protocol allows crutch-assisted support from day one and full support before lengthening ends, with a warning that unrestricted walking can wear the internal screw and stop further lengthening. The nail comes out after the bone has consolidated, a second operation followed by two to three weeks on crutches because the empty screw holes weaken the bone.

Risks specific to a rotation-driven nail

Three problems recur across Albizzia-family series; none exist with a magnetic nail.

First, pain during clicking. Guichet's own 2003 paper reported ratcheting under general anaesthesia in 13 of 41 femora. In the independent Montpellier series, 8 of 36 patients needed at least one ratcheting under anaesthesia, and three lengthening programmes failed outright. Calder's 2017 historical review in Injury states that the motorised Fitbone was developed precisely to remove the pain of the manual leg rotation the ratchet requires.

Second, premature consolidation. The inventor's site describes a window two to three weeks after surgery when bone forms so fast that clicking becomes 'very difficult, if not impossible', needing a brief anaesthetic to force a few clicks or, if caught late, a new operation to cut the bone. The Salford series saw premature consolidation in 4 of 8 femora.

Third, the opposite: uncontrolled movement. Salford also reported one runaway lengthening and a bent nail. Any twist can advance the ratchet, so the mechanism that lets you lengthen at home can also lengthen when you did not intend it. The ordinary internal-nail risks of non-union and hardware failure sit on top of all three.

How much evidence exists, honestly

Thin, and old. PubMed returns seven results for 'Guichet nail' and eleven for 'Albizzia nail' (searched September 2026), not all of them relevant; the relevant papers date from 1997 to 2012, and the largest is Guichet's own 31-patient series. The independent series are small: 36 femora in Montpellier, 24 in Madrid, five Albizzia nails in Salford. We found no peer-reviewed series of the current Guichet nail, the version a clinic will actually implant today.

Compare that with the magnetic nails. The 2020 Bone & Joint Research systematic review of cosmetic stature lengthening pooled 795 patients across 11 studies, and not one used an Albizzia or Guichet nail. Frost's 2023 multicentre cohort of 314 lengthening nails covered Fitbone and PRECICE only. The internal-nail complication ranges quoted elsewhere on this site do not transfer to this device.

What the old data does say is consistent. Knee motion is well preserved: mean flexion was unchanged at about 148 degrees in 27 bilateral patients. Consolidation ran at 35 days per centimetre in Madrid. And patients averaged three operations per limb in Guichet's own cohort, counting insertion, removal and anything in between.

How to read a clinic that offers it

Ask four things.

Who does the clicking when it hurts? A clinic that says pain is 'non-existent or minimal' should also tell you how many of its patients needed an anaesthetic to ratchet. The inventor's own site allows for a brief general anaesthetic when clicking stalls; a clinic that never mentions this is leaving something out.

Where are the numbers published? The Athens clinic's page states a mechanical-failure rate 'less than 2%' and a non-union rate 'less than 2%'; the inventor's site states a 67 mm average. Neither figure appears in a peer-reviewed journal as far as we could find. Ask for the paper. If there is none, the number is an internal audit at best.

Which version of the nail, and who made it? The Guichet nail replaced the Albizzia; the Athens clinic calls its implant X-os. Ask for the CE certificate and for the surgeon's personal count with this specific nail.

What happens if it stalls? Get the plan for premature consolidation and for a bent or jammed nail in writing, including who pays for the second operation and where it happens if you have already flown home.

At a glance

Typical gain
5–8 cm
Total recovery
12–20 weeks
Distraction sites
femur, tibia
External hardware
No
Manufacturer
Dr Jean-Marc Guichet (G-Nail; evolution of the Albizzia nail)
Status
Actively used

What this means for a patient

  • Full weight-bearing from day one
  • Fully internal — no external frame
  • No motor or electronics that can fail
  • Faster return to daily life than external-only methods

Trade-offs and risks

  • Lengthening by rotation can be painful at the osteotomy site
  • Patient must perform the rotation maneuvers
  • Less fine-grained control than motorized or magnetic nails
  • Requires a removal surgery after consolidation

Frequently asked questions

Is lengthening with the Guichet nail painful?

It depends on the patient more than on the nail. The inventor's site says clicking is painless when the patient is relaxed and well prepared. His own 2003 series still needed ratcheting under general anaesthesia in 13 of 41 femora, and an independent Montpellier series reported 8 of 36 patients needing at least one anaesthetic for ratcheting. Expect the possibility, and ask the clinic for its own rate.

How much height can you gain with the Guichet nail?

The inventor's site puts the femoral ceiling at 10 cm, more only with a nail exchange. Published averages are lower: 6.3 cm in Guichet's bilateral stature patients, 6.2 cm in a later 27-patient series, 4.7 cm in Montpellier's mixed cases. A realistic cosmetic plan is 5 to 8 cm on the femurs. The tibia heals less well, and the inventor's own site notes that some tibias need a bone graft.

Can you walk after Guichet nail surgery?

Yes, with crutches, from the day of surgery. That is the nail's main advantage over PRECICE 2, which restricts weight-bearing during distraction. The inventor's protocol allows light support immediately and full support before lengthening ends, but warns that unrestricted walking can wear the internal screw and block further lengthening. Weight-bearing here means supervised, not unlimited.

Is the Guichet nail the same as the Albizzia nail?

No, but it is a direct descendant. The Albizzia was Guichet's original ratchet nail, implanted in patients from 1993. His current site says the Guichet nail 'replaces the Albizzia'; a Greek clinic dates the current version to 2010 and describes a hardened steel alloy with chromium and cobalt. The clicking principle is unchanged. Nearly all the published data is on the Albizzia, not on the nail implanted today.

Is the Guichet nail available in the United States?

Not as far as this site can find. The inventor operates in London and Milan, the published series are French, Spanish and British, and the Athens clinic offering it describes an EU CE mark. None of the 64 US clinics listed on this site use it; their internal-nail work is magnetic, PRECICE 2 and PRECICE Max. Treat any US offer of a Guichet nail as something to verify with the surgeon and the implant's regulatory paperwork.

Sources
Medical disclaimer

This page is editorial reporting, not medical advice. Every patient anatomy is different — technique selection requires in-person consultation with a qualified surgeon.

Are you a clinic?

Get listed in our directory.

We verify every clinic before listing — surgeons, methods, hospital affiliation, regulatory status. Submit your clinic for editorial review. No paid rankings. No hidden fees.

Apply to be listed