Limb lengthening clinics in Indonesia
2 independently-verified clinics in Indonesia. Methods offered: Ilizarov.
Indonesia's two listed centres are both in Jakarta and both reconstructive: a private hospital with a publicly promoted limb-lengthening and reconstruction service, and the national referral and teaching hospital, whose lead surgeon is an internationally published distraction-osteogenesis authority. Both work with Ilizarov and monolateral external fixators for leg-length discrepancy, deformity and post-infection non-union; neither confirms internal magnetic nails, and neither markets cosmetic height surgery. No prices are published, and contact runs through general hospital call centres rather than a lengthening desk. Indonesian is the working language. For a healthy adult seeking height, these are reference centres, not a booking option.
Side-by-side comparison
| # | Clinic | Lead surgeon | Methods | Price | Directory Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RS Pondok Indah - Orthopaedic Centre Jakarta (Pondok Indah / Bintaro Jaya, South Jakarta & Tangerang) | Dr. Faisal Mi'raj, Sp.OT (K) | Ilizarov | — | 4.9 / 5 6000 reviews · 1 platform | T1 |
| 2 | RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta (Central Jakarta) | Dr. Ismail Hadisoebroto Dilogo, Sp.OT (K) | Ilizarov | — | 3.5 / 5 1000 reviews · 1 platform | T3 |
RS Pondok Indah - Orthopaedic Centre
Dr. Faisal Mi'raj, Sp.OT (K), Sp.OT (K) — Indonesian Orthopaedic & Traumatology Surgeon, Consultant grade
RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
Dr. Ismail Hadisoebroto Dilogo, Sp.OT (K), MD (Universitas Indonesia, 1994); Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery specialty (Universitas Indonesia, 2003); Doctorate/S3 (Universitas Indonesia, 2007); member, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS, since 2008); member, Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association (APOA, since 2004); member, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society / ASAMI-North America (since 2010)
By Directory Score — a single published number used only to sort. It normalises every independent rating a clinic holds to a five-point scale, weights each platform by how hard it is to inflate (Google first, Trustpilot second, doctor-booking sites capped low), and pulls thin evidence back toward the field average so a handful of friendly reviews cannot lift a clinic to the top.
A clinic is only eligible to be scored with a real base: at least 30 reviews on one platform and 40 across all of them. Below that it is listed as Unranked and sorts after the scored clinics — absence of evidence, not a verdict.
Position is never for sale, and neither is a rating. A paid profile buys presentation — more photos, a longer description, an interview — and nothing that moves a clinic up this page. Each platform’s own score stays visible and source-linked on the clinic profile; we never present one blended star as the truth. Editorial policy.